Chowist Web Search

Search results

1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network

2. How Congress is fighting the rise of nonconsensual AI porn - AOL

   www.aol.com/congress-fighting-rise-nonconsensual...

   July 7, 2024 at 3:00 PM. Political momentum is building to regulate the spread of nonconsensual explicit deepfakes as the issue of the digitally altered images has moved from a potential threat to ...

3. LifeProof - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LifeProof

   LifeProof was founded in 2009 by Gary Rayner. [2] He is a serial entrepreneur and has an MBA in Business from Queensland University of Technology. [3] After 18 months and a $1 million investment, the company made its public debut at the 2011 LAUNCH Conference where it won awards for the best product and best presentation after a demonstration with a LifeProof-protected iPhone 4 that included ...

4. Rash guard - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rash_guard

   Rash guard. Surfing "long-sleeves" rashguard. A rash guard, also known as rash vest or rashie, is an athletic shirt made of spandex and nylon or polyester. The name rash guard reflects the fact that the shirt protects the wearer against rashes caused by abrasion, or by sunburn from extended exposure to the sun, as sun protective clothing .

5. Codpiece - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codpiece

   Codpiece and dog belonging to Guidobaldo II della Rovere, Duke of Urbino, portrait by Angelo Bronzino, 1531-32. A codpiece was commonly worn during the Renaissance; oil on oak painting by Pieter Brueghel the Younger. A codpiece (from Middle English cod ' scrotum ') is a triangular piece that attached to the front of men's hose, covering the fly.

6. Amazon is responsible for hazardous items sold by third-party ...

   www.aol.com/news/amazon-responsible-hazardous...

   July 30, 2024 at 1:55 PM. Amazon is responsible under federal safety law for hazardous products sold on its platform by third-party sellers and shipped by the company, a U.S. government agency ...

7. Frontiero v. Richardson - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frontiero_v._Richardson

   Dissent. Rehnquist. Laws applied. U.S. Const. amend. V; 37 U.S.C. §§ 401, 403; 10 U.S.C. §§ 1072, 1076. Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case [ 1] which decided that benefits given by the United States military to the family of service members cannot be given out differently because of ...