Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
United States free speech exceptions. The Bill of Rights in the National Archives. In the United States, some categories of speech are not protected by the First Amendment. According to the Supreme Court of the United States, the U.S. Constitution protects free speech while allowing limitations on certain categories of speech. [ 1]
A Distant Heritage: The Growth of Free Speech in Early America. New York: New York University Press, 1995. Godwin, Mike (1998). Cyber Rights: Defending Free Speech in the Digital Age. New York: Times Books. ISBN 0-8129-2834-2. Rabban, David M. (1999). Free Speech in Its Forgotten Years, 1870–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) McConnell v. FEC (2003) (in part) Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The court held 5–4 that the freedom of ...
Texas v. Johnson. Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the Flag of the United States was protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech .
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression ( FIRE ), formerly called the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, is a 501 (c) (3) [1] non-profit civil liberties group founded in 1999 with the mission of protecting freedom of speech on college campuses in the United States. [2] [3] [4] FIRE changed its name in June 2022, when it ...
EO 12674 - Principles of Ethical Conduct for Government Officers and Employees [3] 5 C.F.R. Part 2635, as amended at 81 FR 48687 - Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch [4] EO 12356 - National Security Information [5] Whistleblower protection laws for the military:
U.S. Const. amend. I; Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996. Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002), is a U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down two overbroad provisions of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 because they abridged "the freedom to engage in a substantial amount of lawful speech". [2]
A non-public person's right to privacy from publicity is balanced against the First Amendment right of free speech. False light laws are "intended primarily to protect the plaintiff's mental or emotional well-being". [18] If a publication of information is false, then a tort of defamation might have occurred.